Hello my friends! I know it has been a while (like before Christmas, I believe). Unfortunately, I have had to focus heavy effort on one of my final classes for my BSN. God help me, I cannot wait to be done. School continues for a while but as I near the end of my last 400 level class, I felt the need to voice an opinion on my supposedly non-political blog about yet another Gun Violence Tragedy.
First off, I am unequivocally PRO-gun! I like my hunting rifle and aspire to own more guns over the course of my life. I also believe in the 2nd Amendment and its original rationale. Any argument that the founding fathers did not have the foresight to see that technology would advance, especially in the field of arms and weaponry, is invalid. These guys grew up with fathers and grandfathers who related stories of the early advancements in gun technology. Don’t tell me they couldn’t foresee increased efficiency, deadliness, and rapidity. These were the smartest men alive at the time.
If we operate under the assumption that the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed (stay with me…I am going somewhere with this), then how do we mitigate the seemingly endless gun violence that has become, dare I say it….Commonplace?
I note several aspects to this problem. Mental health care in this country is deplorable and has shifted to outpatient as a primary means of care for these disease processes that are intricate and may require inpatient resources. This needs massive overhaul and expansion. We simply cannot make it with minimal available inpatient services and MH clinics that are overwhelmed and spend only the minimal time with each patient. People need close follow up and adjustment for medications.
Never should guns be absolutely restricted-that is the essence a country that is not infringing on the 2nd Amendment rights. Here is the thing: rights come with responsibilities and the irresponsible those who have other reasons not to be a gun owner can only be sussed out through a screening process. We have to make it harder to get guns for those who shouldn’t have them. Whatever form that takes: longer waiting periods, more extensive background checks, MH evaluation before purchase–I don’t care.
The point is this: if your are mentally stable, competent, of age and not buying a gun impulsively to commit a crime or mass murder: you get to own whatever guns you wish. You can have your AR-15. You can have whatever makes you happy and safe and comfortable because it is your right guaranteed by the constitution. The problem is, your right shouldn’t infringe on the rights of others and if you cant be responsible with a right you cannot have it any longer. It is simple as that. That isn’t infringement–it is responsible lawmaking.
I know…I know…that sounds a lot like a violation of rights guaranteed by the constitution. But let’s agree on one thing: Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are the PROPER order of your unalienable rights. Your liberty shouldn’t infringe on someone’s life or pursuit of happiness… I am personally very FOR guns and would happily submit to any additional clearances to ensure that those who shouldn’t have a gun DON’T.
I know what the anti-gun folks will say: that isn’t enough. What does someone need an AR-15 for? Well…that really isn’t your right to say, so long as they pass the required screenings and wait for however long the law deems. I propose that the law is what is flawed. Stronger laws governing gun acquisition are what is needed. Certainly this will not stop all bad people from getting dangerous weapons. This is where the third part of my plan comes in: Armed Guards at the Schools. I know this has been a meme around the internet for a while….but it might just work. Employ 3-4 or more veterans per school. Open it up to ex-cops. Give tax breaks and additional funding for schools that initiate this system. I would wager that there’d be a large compliment of veterans willing to participate.
Whatever way we go about this, as a nation, we need to stop with indecision and address this problem. Ultimately, the deaths of children cannot go unanswered….but altering the fundamental rights provided for in one our nation’s oldest and most sacred documents is tricky and an extremely slippery slope. I believe we are not past hope and the situation has a solution if we approach it from all angles as a nation and attempt to think and act as one. The lives of our children depend on it…